News:

SMF - Just Installed!


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - khan

Pages: 1 2 [3]
31
Success Stories / Re: Today I sent a Statutory Demand For Payment
« on: September 15, 2017, 05:29:40 pm »
....And then I sent them another Email...  :D :D :D :D :D :D


Hi,

Your reply to my statutory demand email seemed to imply that your company was either unable to pay or unwilling to pay within 21 days. Can you confirm this for me?

Also, I would be grateful if you could read the planned advert for the Gazzette and let me know if the company details are correct. Thanks. Khan.


-----------------------------------------------------
Petitions to Wind Up (Companies)

In the County Court at Stockport

No XXX of 2017

In the Matter of ALPHA TECHNOLOGY (INT) LIMITED

(Company Number 08483921)

and in the Matter of the Insolvency Act 1986

A Petition to wind up the above-named company (registered no 08483921) of Manchester Business Park, 3000 Aviator Way, Manchester, M22 5TG, presented on XX MONTH 2017 by Mr  Khan of 5012 X Road, London, SX 6XX (the Petitioner), claiming to be a creditor of the company will be heard at the County Court at Stockport, The Courthouse, Edward Street, Stockport, SK1 3NF

Date: DAY, XX MONTH 2017

Time: HH.MM hours

(or as soon thereafter as the petition can be heard).

Any person intending to appear on the hearing of the Petition (whether to support or oppose it) must give notice of intention to do so to the Petitioner in accordance with Rule 4.16 by 16.00 hours on DAY-1, XX MONTH 2017.

The petitioner is Mr Khan of 5123 X Road, London, X6 6XX. Telelphone 0XX3. Email XXX_khan@hotmail.com (Ref ALPHA)

XX MONTH 2017









32
Success Stories / Today I sent a Statutory Demand For Payment
« on: September 15, 2017, 05:23:46 pm »
Today I sent them another reply...



Hi,


I have a number of questions. You can choose to answer these or not however, you should probably think about how this will look to a judge in a county court and how the answering of these questions will be able to allow a Judge to differentiate between a company that scams customers vs one that is open and actually wishes to be able to pay its debtors.


1) Serving Winding Up Documents

I know that documents can be posted, emailed, or left at your office (which is a virtual one). It does not have to be to Mubasher Akram personally. I would be grateful if you can provide me with a home address for Mubasher Akram or a personal email so that I can ensure that he has been served winding up documents. Can you confirm if Mubasher Akram has a personal email? If so, can you provide it? I am wanting to make every effort to ensure that he at least has sight of the documents heading his way. Please be assured that court documents will be left at your office address and emailed to your company email in electronic format. How can a company director of a company that has zero sales and produces zero goods be overseas on business trips and be busy in meetings? It beggars belief. It's more likely he is trying to avoide being served. If not, please supply me with his details, even a telephone number would suffice so i can at least call.


2) Payment of Money You Owe Me

Can you at least make some effort to try to pay me the money that you owe me? At the moment your company simply stays quiet and does not reply to any of my demands for money nor does it propose any solutions.


3) Documentary Evidences

Can you provide documentary evidence to support any of the reasons why you say you cannot pay your debts? Example - you state that no winding up petition has worked against you. Can you provide County Court Judgements to back up what you are saying? If cases have been dismissed, you get Judgements saying so. Just send me a copy. It might sacre me away. Example - you say you have money in Paypal. Can you give documentary evidence of such claim? Example - you say there is money for HMRC (tax). Can you provide Bank statements? Tax depends on profit - Where is the profit in your company? It hasn't had a single sale in ages. Sales are zero. VAT is done quarterly and we are more than 3 years down the line so lets not use that excuse.


4) Company Outgoings

What are your company outgoings and can you provide documentary evidence? Why can you pay staff wages and hire legal representitives but not be able to repay your creditors?


5) Won't see another penny...

On September 8th 2016, I had an email from your company stating that it cannot pay me and that I would never see another penny. Is this still the position of your company? If not, what is the new position and what are you willing to do? How many people have you settled out of court with before?


6) Bankruptcy and Winding-Up

When a company owes £750 and cannot pay it then quite simply its bankrupt. Can you give reasons as to why you think your company cannot be wound up or should not be wound up? Please note your company has zero sales and not profitable and definitely not "positive" cash flow. As I am in a position to be able to wind up your company, you should be more open and frank with me. Simply putting head in sand and wishing people go away attracts further legal recourse.


Now that you are reading this bit, I would like to inform you that I will be sending this email in with my application to wind up your company if you do not repay me the money owed. A Judge will most likely read this email (and my questions) and wonder if the company replied to me on any of my questions. I will be raising with a Judge why your company is giving information or arguments in court that it could have raised with me (a creditor) earlier after getting this email. Bringing items to court on the day will invite a question, why could you not have given this earlier on in proceedings? This tactic is called "ambush" and looked down upon but I doubt you can use it now that I have brought it up and sent you this email WAY in advance of any court appearance.


I would like you to pay all monies due to me immediately.


Regards,

Khan










33
Success Stories / Today I sent a Statutory Demand For Payment
« on: September 14, 2017, 10:41:55 pm »
Hi Guys,

Just to let you know I filled out a Statutory Demand For Payment and sent it to Alpha via email and post.

The Form can be found here (Form SD1)
https://www.gov.uk/statutory-demands/forms-to-issue-a-statutory-demand

I got a reply from Alpha a few hours later

Hello Khan,
As shown in our previous 2 court appearances dealing with a winding-up
petition, we have shown that Alpha does not have spare funds in our bank
accounts to pay for any claimed debts, and remainder being held for tax
purposes to HMRC, hence also any 3rd party debt order which has
previously been attempted has failed.
Our Director is abroad, but a legal representative will see you in
court.
Regards
Danny K
Alpha-T


To which I replied

Danny,

Somehow what you are saying does not add up. If a winding up had gone to a hearing then there would be a gazette entry. Fact is there is none. This means that your company has settled out of court. I know one such individual personally.

If a company cannot pay then it gets wound up. Simple. If you don't pay me as the court ordered then your company will be bankrupted. Legal representative or none doesn't bother me.

Now are you really going to continue this charade of not being able to afford to pay? Hmrc only charge tax on profits... I can see your company has not made profit. Who are you kidding?

Pay me in full or I will wind up the company. Your company has no sales. No profit. Lots of cash in the bank and in hand. I am sure the official reciever will be able to find the cash. The director can be on timbutktu... i am sure he can still acess emails. Tell me how the company pays your wages? Not everyone is a fool.

Khan


I mean how can they be paying HMRC tax when the company had made losses? Hmmmm pay tax on losses? Hmmmmm.
If winding up gets to court then the petitioner needs to advertise in the Gazette.... Do a search for Alpha and you find no adverts.... This means that Alpha pussied out last minute and settled as they know that they would likely get bankrupted.
I know of Dynofly so far. Is there anyone else who has gone down the winding up route?

34
Success Stories / Re: Winding Up Order Success!!!
« on: May 30, 2017, 11:24:43 am »
great news

35
Success Stories / Re: OMG - I got a partial refund
« on: September 30, 2016, 10:27:11 pm »
won a judgement and mailed alpha. they refunded the paypal portion of my payment.... then they told me i won't see another penny.... we'll see about that.

36
Judgements / Re: Group Enforcement
« on: September 30, 2016, 10:23:29 pm »
guys,
i applied to bring in mubasher for questioning at a court. we will see how that comes about. i will post the bank details about where all the money is.  in the meantime, there may be a way to get ur money back. as soon as i find out if it can work, i will post here. don't want to raise false hopes.
what unexpected event is scs talking about?

37
Judgements / Re: Yet another judgement win against Alpha
« on: September 08, 2016, 11:23:24 pm »
Hello xxxxxxx,

You are talking to a customer representative. But the Director is away
for business, these are multi-million pound supplier deals. Your order
has little priority over the larger dealings at hand.

You have been refunded and we do not have the funds to refund you more.
I repeat you will not see any more funds ever sent to you.

Regards

Danny K.

38
Success Stories / OMG - I got a partial refund
« on: September 07, 2016, 04:55:59 pm »
Guys,
I got a partial refund 30%. Its not enough to satisfy the judgement, but it more than covers cost of litigation so far. I will keep everyone posted.

39
Judgements / Re: Yet another judgement win against Alpha
« on: September 06, 2016, 09:03:13 pm »
I sent a mail and got a reply.....

> From: info@alpha-t.net <info@alpha-t.net>
> Sent: 06 September 2016 15:18
> To: xxxxxxx
> Cc: payments@alpha-t.net; customer@alpha-t.net
> Subject: Re: Case C3QZ852T: Judgement against you

> Hello xxxxxxx,
>
> These will not be satisfied till we ship, as we do not have the
> available funds to pay for these at this time. You may take further
> actions like the others have attempted to do, however we will not pay
> this amount.
>
> Regards
>
> M.Akram
>
> On 2016-09-06 13:30, xxxxxxx wrote:
> > Mr Akram,
> >
> > Just to let you know you lost your case and that you need to pay me my
> > money. If you do not pay by the end of today I will take out further
> > proceedings against you. Please find attached a judgement for my case
> > and a list of other judgements against you.
> >
> > xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Claimant

40
Judgements / Yet another judgement win against Alpha
« on: September 05, 2016, 07:24:09 pm »
Here is how my judgement reads.....

Before District Judge Desai sitting at the County Court at Lambeth, Court House, Cleaver Street, Kennington Road, London, SE11 4DZ
Upon hearing the Claimant in person and upon the Defendant not attending
And upon the Defendant having failed to give notice of their intention not to attend to the Claimant or to the Court
And upon considering the e-mails provided by the Claimant
It is adjudged that
there be judgment for the Claimant against the Defendant for the sum of £7,165.91 for debt and interest to date of judgment and £410.00 for costs amounting together to the sum of £7,575.91.
It is ordered that the Defendant pay to the Claimant the sum of £7,575.91 on or before 6 September 2016.

41
Judgements / Yet another judgement win against Alpha
« on: August 23, 2016, 12:50:10 pm »
Guys,
I got a judgement today. The judge pointed towards alphas defence where they are claiming that no claims for timeline were ever made. I simply forwarded 4 emails to the court clerk where alpha were giving dates of July 2014 and that was enough for the judge to award me. The fact they didnt reply to my email for a refund in jan 2015 also helped. furthermore, i told the judge, if that company had said they were unsure of dates i would never have parted with money in the first place.

42
Alpha's Counter-attacks / Latest Alpha Defense
« on: March 31, 2016, 12:08:24 pm »
Defence and Counterclaim
Claim number
Cxxxxx
Claimant
Mr xxxxx
Defendant
ALPHA TECHNOLOGY (INT) LTD
 
How much of the claim do you dispute?
I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.
 
Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it?
No, for other reasons.
 
Defence
Background
1. The Claim relates to a contract for the supply of goods entered
into between the parties on or around January 2014. The goods in
question are ASIC Litecoin Scrypt Miner Developers, being
specialist computer hardware for the purpose of generating digital
'crypto' currency in the form of Litecoin ('the Product').

2. By way of explanation of the origins of the project for the
creation and sale of the Product. I had publicly (via online
forums) relayed some of my knowledge and developed a proof of
concept to develop the idea into a physical product. As the demand
increased for my designs, I hired a reputable Indian engineering
company (Dexcel Designs) with a view to them creating a proof of
concept and conducting various tests to ensure that the technology
could be physically developed. Dexcel Designs were paid for this
initial work from my own personal funds.

3. The design, development and production of the Product is part
of a pre-funding project whereby customers’ deposits and balancing
payments are used to create the finished Product before shipment.
The project is the subject of regular online updates, given both
the highly technical nature of the Product and its development,
and the interest in such products amongst online communities
following the markets for digital currency (from where many of the
Defendant’s customers seem to originate).


4. Whilst customers’ concerns are understandable, there is no
question of the Defendant acting dishonestly. Customers’
expectations have undoubtedly been affected by the market value of
Litecoin in the intervening period, but again that is not
something for which the Defendant has assumed any responsibility.
From our perspective, customers have always been aware of the
risks associated with a developing technology.

5. A number of customers have been refunded either as a gesture of
good will or as per the contractual terms for discounted deposit
refunds.

6. Current stage of our development is that we have a full stock
of working chips, and are awaiting system and assembly design
completion from Dexcel. It is currently anticipated that the
Product will be ready for shipping to customers in or around Q2
2016, and customers continue to receive updates on these matters
via email and the Defendant’s

7. From an engineering perspective, the longest, most costly and
complex aspect of the project has been completed, being the design
and fabrication of our chips which are fully tested. The assembly
and shipping of the completed product is all that remains.

The Contract and the Claimant’s Order
8. I refer to the exhibited copy of the Contract for its terms.
There were express terms of the Contract, inter alia, as follows:

a. (Under the heading 'Cancellation & Refund Policy'):
i. 'Within 0-1 month after receipt of payment: Full deposit will
be refunded'
ii. 'Within 1-3 months after receipt of payment: 75% of the
deposit will be refunded'
iii. 'Within 3-5 months after receipt of payment: 50% of the
deposit will be refunded'
iv. 'Please note a cancellation fee of £70 towards handling
charges will be applicable along with any cancellation.'
b. (Under the heading 'Shipping, Hashrate, Price Estimates &
Announcements' [emphasis added]):
i. 'Shipping: Booked shipments will be delivered within Q2/Q3 of
Year 2014. Live updates shall be provided on exact shipping date.
Shipping is worldwide.'
c. (Under the heading 'Pre Funding'):
i. 'We would like to double clarify, this is a pre funding
project. This product is NOT in stock, shipping is expected to
take a minimum of 6 months. Where funds are used to fully design
& manufacture your ordered devices.'

9. The Claimant placed their order and paid the related deposit.
They later paid the balance of the consideration for their order.

10. The Claimant cancelled their order and and requested a full
refund.

The Defendant's position
11. In accordance with the Cancellation and Refund Policy, the
Defendant is out of time to receive any element of their deposit.

12. Alternatively, it is the Defendant’s position that the
Claimant was well aware from the express wording of the Contract
that deposits and other funds would be used to fully design &
manufacture their ordered devices. That is how the Defendant's
customers' monies have been used. The Defendant has not
benefitted from receipt of the Claimant's deposit [or balancing
payment] in the sense that the [majority of the] monies – which
were received for this specific and express purpose – have been
paid away to third parties in order to create the finished
Product, in accordance with the nature of the project as described
in the Contract. The Defendant remains liable for its obligations
to deliver the Product to customers who have not cancelled their
orders.

13. Accordingly, I submit that the Defendant has changed its
position due to receipt of the Claimant's payments and that it
would inequitable for the Defendant to be required to repay those
monies, whether in full or in part.

14. In the interests of avoiding the time and expense of
litigation, and as a gesture of good will (but without any
admission of liability), the Defendant has made an offer to refund
a portion of the Claimant's total payment for their order. Such
offer has been rejected, but I submit that it represents more than
the amount to which the Claimant is legally entitled.

15. In addition, the Contract does not specify a fixed time for
delivery (the times referred to, both specifically and in the
context of the Contract as a whole, are estimates) and I reiterate
that the Defendant is doing its best to procure shipment of the
Product to its remaining customers as soon as possible. I
therefore dispute that the Defendant has acted in breach of
contract so as to allow the Claimant to lawfully terminate the
Contract, or at all.
 
Signed
I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true
M.M.Akram
Managing Director
25/03/2016

========================================================

Claim History

You submitted a claim on 17/03/2016 at 11:20:34

Your claim was issued on 18/03/2016

A bar was put in place for ALPHA TECHNOLOGY (INT) LTD on 29/03/2016

ALPHA TECHNOLOGY (INT) LTD filed a defence on 29/03/2016 at 01:04:17
 
 

DQ sent to ALPHA TECHNOLOGY (INT) LTD on 30/03/2016

43
Success Stories / Re: Successful recovery of all funds and legal costs
« on: March 24, 2016, 05:05:43 pm »
hmmm... so no assets or money but they can give an update on 7th january 2016 as follows....

Greetings Miners!

First of we would like to send out our greetings and happy holidays to all ours customers.

We understand there has been some time since our last update, and want to be totally honest with our customers. When we started this project, we had a proof of concept which we publicly released, this design was proven by engineers and was a new advancement in 'Scrypt hashing'.

Upon positive feedback of our design concept, we received a lot of attention and demand from our customers to complete our chip design and produce it into a working and 'mining' product.  We had a clear plan and strategy which was based on feedback from our designers and manufacturers. And we stated to all our customers we would constantly provide news updates on our progress and shipping time.

As you know we have had many unexpected delays which have been out of our control. Such delays are expected when developing a new technology, as an example there is a considerable risks in the chip design being a fail when we reach the tape-out stage at the foundry (a high cost NRE). As you know that our chips passed all stages at the foundry and we have had a large stock piles of chips waiting to be assembled into units.

We believe it is better to take time in delivering this product, than giving up/failing and leaving our customers empty handed as a lot of other companies have done.

We will be repaying our customers patience with our loyalty scheme, and the obvious hash-rate increase which we had already previously given. And we request all customers to be patient and trust us that any delays have been out of our control and we are fully committed and well funded to assemble these chips into a durable efficient device. We also understand there is little or no competition with our product in this area, where a lot of projects and companies have failed trying to produce scrypt-hashing devices. However, we have persevered through any adversities and have not given up in getting our product out to our customers.  We have rectified our issues and done our utmost to not disappoint our customers. We hope this patience pays of to our customers, whether it's through this product or with our loyalty scheme. We have many plans for the future where we believe our customers will benefit hugely from.

Our only recently delays have been in the system-side of things, which is more of a time issue rather than a cost issue. This issue is to do with the power regulation, where we are still trying our utmost to reduce the power required by our overall system.

We have been working  on the stability of our dc dc regulators. Our UK design team have been closely working with Altera to make sure our Enpirion updated design met all the design rules. It seems something about the load characteristics means is unstable. We seem to have exhausted what we can do with these devices and are working on an alternative method where we would not need any regulators at all. This is something highly technological and requires skilled engineers to pull-of, which we believe we have now with our UK design team.

We will be providing technical updates on a regular basis now regarding this issue.

 

Best Regards,

Alpha Technology Team

 

Pages: 1 2 [3]